Politics
On May 5th, 2009 many people were listening to Boom Boom Pow by The Black Eyed Peas. On the same day a meeting took place an important meeting that may have gone unnoticed by many but highlighted as noteworthy by a few. On Sunday May 24th, 2009 the Indianapolis 500 was won by Hélio Castroneves and John Harlow of the Sunday Times reported on a meeting of the “Good Club." According to Harlow the philanthropists who attended the meeting on the initiative of Bill Gates, discussed joining forces to "overcome political and religious obstacles to change." But, who attended the meeting and what change were they discussing? Perhaps the answer to the second part of the question can be found in the words of Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh when in 1981 he told People magazine, “Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival." In further interviews Prince Philip made it clear his feelings on overpopulation.
Philip's concerns were an echo of those expressed in 1974, in a American “National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” also known as the "Kissinger Report". In November 1975 President Gerald Ford implemented the recommendations in the "Kissinger Report. The covert plan to reduce population growth through birth control was assigned to the then CIA director George H. W. Bush. The once chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Maxwell Taylor said by the beginning of the twenty-first century, it would be necessary to reduce the world’s population, mostly in third-world countries, using methods such as disease. He reaffirmed such words in the New York Times in January 1984. Was it these earlier events that led to the meeting of the “Good Club" in 2009. A meeting that was attended by Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., Warren Buffett, George Soros, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, and Oprah Winfrey. Conspiracy It is over 30 years since the first United Nations Annual Population Day, and 25 years since the first annual conference on Population and Sustainable Development. Both looked at Population growth as an impending crisis. However, by the start of a new century those concerns seemed to fade from the public gaze. Through the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates and his wife took a strong interest in Africa. They became active partners with the W.H.O in finding solutions to birth control. Gates has also invested time, money and resources in vaccine research. Eugenics is the practice or advocacy of improving the human species. It aims to reduce human suffering by “breeding out” disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population. Popular in the early 1900s it underpinned Nazi policy in the 1930s - 1940s. With the fall of Nazi Germany the notion of eugenics was confined to history or was it? We have already seen that eugenics was still in the thoughts of many in the 1980s and America implemented the recommendations of the Kissinger Report. Scientific American ran articles on the subject, and the American Museum of Natural History hosted conferences. Theodore Roosevelt, Alexander Graham Bell, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and many other prominent citizens were outspoken supporters including Margaret Sanger who founded the American Birth Control League. The same organisation that William Henry Gates II, better known as Bill Gates Sr became involved with. Because of this link it has been claimed that Bill Gates Jnr and the current Rockefeller Foundation are investing in institutions that can deliver a eugenics programme.
For many the link is tenuous but it has to be remembered that eugenics was taught in schools, celebrated in exhibits at the World’s Fair, and even preached from pulpits. Is it hard to believe that a link may exist?
The Rockefeller Foundation has taken an interest in Covid. They have committed $50 million towards a track and trace system. While the Gates Foundation has invested over $100 million dollars. In Showing Up For Life Bill Gates Senior writes admiringly of the Rockefeller Foundation a foundation created by the same family who had strong links to Nazi Germany.
The investments in vaccine research are huge particularly when you consider that vaccines have only ever eradicated 2 viruses.
Harlow when reporting on the meeting of the "Good Club" in 2009 said that a consensus was reached that “they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.” President Ronald Reagan once said in a speech to the UN, "What if all of us in the world were threatened by an outer power, from outer space, from another planet. "We would all of a sudden find out that we didn't have any differences at all."
A Covid pandemic unifies the world in the same way that an alien invasion of the world would. When the WHO announced that Covid was a world pandemic how many people knew that Bill Gates and the Rockefellers were two of the WHO's largest financial backers. Is it really inconceivable, that the powers that be, might create a crisis, using a virus to influence actions, opinion, establish compliance and possibly inflict something far more sinister?
Is it possible or even plausible that populations can be manipulated to ensure they are compliant? "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" is a document published jointly by the Rockefeller Foundation and The Global Business Network. On page 18 the discussion is about a scenario called "Lock Step" it looks at the implications of pandemics and tighter government controls. The publication in itself might not be alarming but here is a link to a UK government website. MINDSPACE explores how behaviour change theory can help meet current policy challenge and goes onto say: "Today's policy makers are in the business of influencing behaviour - they need to understand the effects their policies may be having. The aim of MINDSPACE is to help them do this". Donald W. Scott, school teacher and author of The Brucellosis Triangle and a Canadian political candidate, has speculated that as far back as the 1940s there existed a high-level agenda to research a viral pandemic. Yes another conspiracy theory but it does a have a factual basis. Operation Sea-Spray was a 1950 U.S. Navy secret experiment in which Serratia marcescens and Bacillus globigii bacteria were sprayed over the San Francisco Bay Area in California. From September 20 to 27, 1950, the U.S. Navy released the pathogens off the shore of San Francisco. Based on results from monitoring equipment at 43 locations around the city, the Army determined that San Francisco had received enough of a dose for nearly all of the city's 800,000 residents to inhale the particles. On October 11, 1950, eleven residents checked into Stanford Hospital for very rare, serious urinary tract infections. Although ten residents recovered, one patient, Edward J. Nevin, died three weeks later. The UTI patients were all deemed to have acquired the infection in hospital. Moralising
None of us can know for sure whether there is a global conspiracy by an elite to control the world population, but should we not at least question why dissenting voices are being smeared and their messages suppressed. This article is not a denial of Covid indeed it is
an affirmation that it does exist and it exists to control the world population. Mainstream Media has been complicit in perpetuating "Project Fear". When people have died of other illnesses but have tested positive for covid their deaths have been announced as ‘died after testing positive. This is not the same as dying ‘of’ covid. How many thousands of people’s deaths have been wrongly attributed to covid. It appears direct deaths by covid have been manipulated. In contrast the indirect deaths have been hushed. The consequences of lock downs are that patients with other chronic health problems are having their lives cut short. Treatments are being postponed.
Conclusion
Perhaps you are not convinced that we are being manipulated and will continue to follow government guidelines. I hope that by reading the information and the links you will at least acknowledge that some members of your society have genuine concerns. Those concerns are based on published documents historical factual events or comments made by scientists, doctors, politicians and royalty. Please do not call people cranks or morons for trying to present you with information that is not being shown to you or is suppressed. It is divisive and may have unforeseen consequences.