Late October 2020 and in the UK the people wait for confirmation that there will be another national lockdown. For many businesses it will be the final death knell, while for many people food poverty and homelessness will become a reality. How on earth have we got here, was it government mismanagement of a worldwide pandemic or an irrational fear implanted by government advisors and the media? The world population is 7.8 billion people. Worldwide there has apparently been 45.7M cases of Covid, of these case 29.8M recovered and there have been 1.19M deaths which as a percentage of the world population is just over .01%. In the UK we have a population of 66.65 million people, 1.01M Covid cases, 46,555 Covid deaths 0.06% of the population and apparently no one has recovered. Never before have world governments initiated national lockdowns and enforcement of mask wearing until now. The UK government imposed mandatory mask wearing on the 24th July 2020 in shops this was after the first UK lockdown had been imposed on the 16th March 2020. Those who questioned the mask mandate were ridiculed and told it was only temporary and yet at 19.00hrs on the 31st October 2020 Boris Johnson announced a second lockdown for 4 weeks. Why, if masks work are we now entering another lockdown? On the 31st October 2020 The Mail Online referenced and published an article about research that was conducted by Which. The research highlighted the inadequacies of non-medical masks. Earlier on the 27th October an article was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine Journal that highlighted that there was no conclusive evidence that wearing masks in community settings provided any significant protection. In the same month a trial conducted by researchers in Denmark was denied publication in major science and medical journals. These include the Lancet the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA. ‘They all said no,’ said Professor Christian Torp-Pedersen, chief physician in the Research Department at North Zealand Hospital. The study was initiated at the end of April, following a grant of DKK 5m (£600,000) from the Salling Foundations (owner of the Salling Group, Denmark’s largest retailer). It involved 6,000 Danes, half of whom had to wear face masks in public over a long period of time. The other half were the control group.
A large proportion of the test participants were employees of the Salling Group’s supermarkets: Bilka, Føtex and Netto.
The study and its size are unique, and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of face masks in public spaces provides protection against coronavirus infections. With the refusal to publish the research findings are we to assume the research did not support the use of masks in public areas?
Has government and its advisors through fear conditioned people into wearing masks, why are people ignoring some of the evidence in favour of statements made by government? Fear of an unseen threat is a powerful motivator, governments know this and have used fear on many occasions to gather support for their actions. For example, the Spanish American War in 1898, World War II 1939, Vietnam War (America joined 1965) and Iraq 2003.
So what is the endgame? I have previously discussed population control, the fourth industrial revolution and now I want you to consider this, greed, yes putting it simply profiteering and greed. The current financial and economic system is stagnant it has plateaued and requires either a complete reset or the maximisation of existing wealth for the few and not the many.
A pandemic through Lockdowns could achieve the changes required. Mandatory protective masks (profit), mandatory vaccines (profit), booster jabs (profit), deny access to national health care, force people to private (profit), online shopping (profit) for the few, create debt and offer new loans or consolidate existing one's (profit).
Yes the theory is based on conspiracy at the top but why would governments suppress the voices of scientists, journals block publications and professional bodies suspend or remove doctors and nurses who speak out?
Even the World Health Organisation a body I have been critical of before have now come out and said there is no need for lockdowns.
Regardless whether you agree with me I hope that at least you will start to question more what governments do in your name, health and wellbeing.
Comments